Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix(deps): update dependency pydantic to v1.9.2 #25

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 11, 2022
Merged

Conversation

renovate[bot]
Copy link
Contributor

@renovate renovate bot commented Aug 11, 2022

Mend Renovate

This PR contains the following updates:

Package Change Age Adoption Passing Confidence
pydantic 1.9.1 -> 1.9.2 age adoption passing confidence

Release Notes

samuelcolvin/pydantic

v1.9.2

Compare Source

Revert Breaking Change: v1.9.1 introduced a breaking change where model fields were
deep copied by default, this release reverts the default behaviour to match v1.9.0 and before,
while also allow deep-copy behaviour via copy_on_model_validation = 'deep'. See #​4092 for more information.

  • Allow for shallow copies of model fields, Config.copy_on_model_validation is now a str which must be
    'none', 'deep', or 'shallow' corresponding to not copying, deep copy & shallow copy; default 'shallow',
    #​4093 by @​timkpaine

Configuration

📅 Schedule: Branch creation - At any time (no schedule defined), Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).

🚦 Automerge: Disabled by config. Please merge this manually once you are satisfied.

Rebasing: Whenever PR becomes conflicted, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.

🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.


  • If you want to rebase/retry this PR, click this checkbox.

This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.

@renovate renovate bot requested a review from bm424 August 11, 2022 13:58
@bm424 bm424 merged commit 40ac80a into main Aug 11, 2022
@bm424 bm424 deleted the renovate/pydantic-1.x branch August 11, 2022 14:57
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant