Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Save full signature file in the SBT leaves? #198

Open
luizirber opened this issue Apr 28, 2017 · 2 comments
Open

Save full signature file in the SBT leaves? #198

luizirber opened this issue Apr 28, 2017 · 2 comments
Labels

Comments

@luizirber
Copy link
Member

Right now, the SBT save command will only save the signature for the specific k it was built with. We might want to save all the signatures in the original file (multiple k, potentially), to be able to share leaves between trees.

Thinking this because I created trees for refseq-k{21,31,51}, and they could all share the same leaves if it was maintained as the original input file.

It is probably a good idea to expose this to sbt_index, there might be cases were it is better to just save the specific k.

@ctb
Copy link
Contributor

ctb commented May 20, 2017 via email

@luizirber
Copy link
Member Author

On the minified side, see #161

luizirber added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 15, 2018
(instead of only the one it was used to build the tree).
This was actually a feature (see #198) but it broke the SBT code
(it wasn't ready for that!)
luizirber added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 16, 2018
move json parsing and init to rust
working on loading sigs

55 failing. Now it's failing because SBT index is saving all signatures
(instead of only the one it was used to build the tree).
This was actually a feature (see #198) but it broke the SBT code
(it wasn't ready for that!)
luizirber added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 16, 2018
move json parsing and init to rust
working on loading sigs

55 failing. Now it's failing because SBT index is saving all signatures
(instead of only the one it was used to build the tree).
This was actually a feature (see #198) but it broke the SBT code
(it wasn't ready for that!)
luizirber added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 2, 2018
move json parsing and init to rust
working on loading sigs

55 failing. Now it's failing because SBT index is saving all signatures
(instead of only the one it was used to build the tree).
This was actually a feature (see #198) but it broke the SBT code
(it wasn't ready for that!)
luizirber added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 2, 2018
move json parsing and init to rust
working on loading sigs

55 failing. Now it's failing because SBT index is saving all signatures
(instead of only the one it was used to build the tree).
This was actually a feature (see #198) but it broke the SBT code
(it wasn't ready for that!)
luizirber added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 2, 2018
move json parsing and init to rust
working on loading sigs

55 failing. Now it's failing because SBT index is saving all signatures
(instead of only the one it was used to build the tree).
This was actually a feature (see #198) but it broke the SBT code
(it wasn't ready for that!)
luizirber added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 2, 2018
move json parsing and init to rust
working on loading sigs

55 failing. Now it's failing because SBT index is saving all signatures
(instead of only the one it was used to build the tree).
This was actually a feature (see #198) but it broke the SBT code
(it wasn't ready for that!)
luizirber added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 5, 2018
move json parsing and init to rust
working on loading sigs

55 failing. Now it's failing because SBT index is saving all signatures
(instead of only the one it was used to build the tree).
This was actually a feature (see #198) but it broke the SBT code
(it wasn't ready for that!)
luizirber added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 5, 2018
move json parsing and init to rust
working on loading sigs

55 failing. Now it's failing because SBT index is saving all signatures
(instead of only the one it was used to build the tree).
This was actually a feature (see #198) but it broke the SBT code
(it wasn't ready for that!)
luizirber added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 7, 2018
move json parsing and init to rust
working on loading sigs

55 failing. Now it's failing because SBT index is saving all signatures
(instead of only the one it was used to build the tree).
This was actually a feature (see #198) but it broke the SBT code
(it wasn't ready for that!)
luizirber added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 7, 2018
move json parsing and init to rust
working on loading sigs

55 failing. Now it's failing because SBT index is saving all signatures
(instead of only the one it was used to build the tree).
This was actually a feature (see #198) but it broke the SBT code
(it wasn't ready for that!)
luizirber added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 7, 2018
move json parsing and init to rust
working on loading sigs

55 failing. Now it's failing because SBT index is saving all signatures
(instead of only the one it was used to build the tree).
This was actually a feature (see #198) but it broke the SBT code
(it wasn't ready for that!)
luizirber added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 7, 2018
move json parsing and init to rust
working on loading sigs

55 failing. Now it's failing because SBT index is saving all signatures
(instead of only the one it was used to build the tree).
This was actually a feature (see #198) but it broke the SBT code
(it wasn't ready for that!)
luizirber added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 7, 2018
move json parsing and init to rust
working on loading sigs

55 failing. Now it's failing because SBT index is saving all signatures
(instead of only the one it was used to build the tree).
This was actually a feature (see #198) but it broke the SBT code
(it wasn't ready for that!)
luizirber added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 10, 2018
move json parsing and init to rust
working on loading sigs

55 failing. Now it's failing because SBT index is saving all signatures
(instead of only the one it was used to build the tree).
This was actually a feature (see #198) but it broke the SBT code
(it wasn't ready for that!)
luizirber added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 24, 2018
move json parsing and init to rust
working on loading sigs

55 failing. Now it's failing because SBT index is saving all signatures
(instead of only the one it was used to build the tree).
This was actually a feature (see #198) but it broke the SBT code
(it wasn't ready for that!)
luizirber added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 24, 2018
move json parsing and init to rust
working on loading sigs

55 failing. Now it's failing because SBT index is saving all signatures
(instead of only the one it was used to build the tree).
This was actually a feature (see #198) but it broke the SBT code
(it wasn't ready for that!)
luizirber added a commit that referenced this issue Dec 28, 2018
move json parsing and init to rust
working on loading sigs

55 failing. Now it's failing because SBT index is saving all signatures
(instead of only the one it was used to build the tree).
This was actually a feature (see #198) but it broke the SBT code
(it wasn't ready for that!)
luizirber added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 9, 2019
move json parsing and init to rust
working on loading sigs

55 failing. Now it's failing because SBT index is saving all signatures
(instead of only the one it was used to build the tree).
This was actually a feature (see #198) but it broke the SBT code
(it wasn't ready for that!)
luizirber added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 10, 2019
move json parsing and init to rust
working on loading sigs

55 failing. Now it's failing because SBT index is saving all signatures
(instead of only the one it was used to build the tree).
This was actually a feature (see #198) but it broke the SBT code
(it wasn't ready for that!)
luizirber added a commit that referenced this issue Mar 21, 2019
move json parsing and init to rust
working on loading sigs

55 failing. Now it's failing because SBT index is saving all signatures
(instead of only the one it was used to build the tree).
This was actually a feature (see #198) but it broke the SBT code
(it wasn't ready for that!)
luizirber added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 18, 2019
move json parsing and init to rust
working on loading sigs

55 failing. Now it's failing because SBT index is saving all signatures
(instead of only the one it was used to build the tree).
This was actually a feature (see #198) but it broke the SBT code
(it wasn't ready for that!)
luizirber added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 21, 2019
move json parsing and init to rust
working on loading sigs

55 failing. Now it's failing because SBT index is saving all signatures
(instead of only the one it was used to build the tree).
This was actually a feature (see #198) but it broke the SBT code
(it wasn't ready for that!)
luizirber added a commit that referenced this issue Apr 22, 2019
move json parsing and init to rust
working on loading sigs

55 failing. Now it's failing because SBT index is saving all signatures
(instead of only the one it was used to build the tree).
This was actually a feature (see #198) but it broke the SBT code
(it wasn't ready for that!)
luizirber added a commit that referenced this issue Jul 7, 2019
move json parsing and init to rust
working on loading sigs

55 failing. Now it's failing because SBT index is saving all signatures
(instead of only the one it was used to build the tree).
This was actually a feature (see #198) but it broke the SBT code
(it wasn't ready for that!)
luizirber added a commit that referenced this issue Aug 24, 2019
move json parsing and init to rust
working on loading sigs

55 failing. Now it's failing because SBT index is saving all signatures
(instead of only the one it was used to build the tree).
This was actually a feature (see #198) but it broke the SBT code
(it wasn't ready for that!)
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants