Swaps HV/MV/LV scaling to supply power scaling

[TemporalOroboros]

About the PR

Changes the damage and stun time calculations for getting electrocuted through a powernet to be independent of the type of cable (LV|MV|HV).
The old base damage was either 20 for LV, 40 for MV, and 60 for HV if you had partially effective insuls or powernet satisfaction * 75 averaged over 1 second.
The new base damage is an initial burst of powernet supply wattage / 50000 plus powernet satisfaction * 20 averaged over the following second if you aren't wearing somewhat effective insuls.

Why / Balance

I'm making a PR to ECS node groups and the hardcoded voltage system was unwieldy. This is a simpler system with less reliance on hardcoded enums. Damage will still scale with powernet type simply through larger powernets having more power running through them.

Technical details

Electrocution damage now comes in two waves.

1. An initial burst proportional to the amount of power being supplied to the powernet.
   2.A trailing burst a second later proportional to the average powernet satisfaction over the preceding second. The trailing burst is only applied if the victim is wearing insuls of under half effectiveness.

Media

• I have added screenshots/videos to this PR showcasing its changes ingame, or this PR does not require an ingame showcase

Breaking changes

Changelog

🆑

• tweak: Electric shocks now scale with the amount of power in the cables instead of the type of cable.
• balance: Electric shocks should be weaker at common (kW) power levels, but now scale indefinitely with network power.

[Anzarot121]

There is a problem that SMES that are closed to themselves can accelerate production/consumption in the network to several MW. Approximately how much damage would be caused to a person if he flew into a grill with such voltage?

[TemporalOroboros]

There is a problem that SMES that are closed to themselves can accelerate production/consumption in the network to several MW. Approximately how much damage would be caused to a person if he flew into a grill with such voltage?

I redid my math and apparently it maxes out at 800 burn. Not sure when went wrong, I was trying to match the existing damage.
I'll fix it when I figure out where the problem is.

Math for old system is min(x, 50000) * 1.5E-3 if you don't have gloves and a hardcoded 20 (lv), 40 (mv), 60 (hv) if you have partially effective gloves.
I'm trying to unhardcode the second bit. The existence of the two separate systems is annoying.

Apparently that E-4 should be an E-5. I'll fix it in the morning.

As an aside, since the new system is just supply * constant * base damage technically having bad gloves can be worse than having no gloves since the case for ~75% effective gloves is uncapped.

[TemporalOroboros]

There is a problem that SMES that are closed to themselves can accelerate production/consumption in the network to several MW. Approximately how much damage would be caused to a person if he flew into a grill with such voltage?

Redid the everything, new max damages are in the table.
The approximate formula for the damage is supply power / 50000 + 20 * averaged supply power / load.

Power:	Min1 Damage:	Max2 Damage:
0	0	0
50kW	1	21
1MW	20	40
4MW	80	100
9MW	180	200
10MW	200	220

Checking the code for power supplies it looks like achieving the critical threshold of 4 MW will require one of the following.

• An AME injecting 200 units per core.
• 40 default radiation collectors.
• 5334 default solar panels.
• 133 Pacman pr 80 Superpacman generators
• 27 default SMES or Substations.
• 400 APCs
  operating at maximum output.

Footnotes

1. Assuming they aren't wearing insuls. ↩

2. Assuming a stable powernet. (<= 100% power satisfaction) ↩

[mirrorcult]

needs changelog to reflect that electrocutions will generally do less damage