Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Verify the method is given to method invocations #1652

Closed

Conversation

Vampire
Copy link
Member

@Vampire Vampire commented Apr 27, 2023

Depends on #1651

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 28, 2023

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 88.46% and project coverage change: +78.19 🎉

Comparison is base (52e7688) 0.00% compared to head (21e31c5) 78.19%.

Additional details and impacted files
@@              Coverage Diff              @@
##             master    #1652       +/-   ##
=============================================
+ Coverage          0   78.19%   +78.19%     
- Complexity        0     4047     +4047     
=============================================
  Files             0      427      +427     
  Lines             0    13075    +13075     
  Branches          0     1689     +1689     
=============================================
+ Hits              0    10224    +10224     
- Misses            0     2219     +2219     
- Partials          0      632      +632     
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
.../org/spockframework/runtime/SimpleFeatureNode.java 84.21% <78.57%> (ø)
...ava/org/spockframework/runtime/model/SpecInfo.java 91.13% <100.00%> (ø)

... and 425 files with indirect coverage changes

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.

@Vampire Vampire force-pushed the verify-method-in-method-invocation branch from 84c6677 to 21e31c5 Compare April 28, 2023 01:04
@Vampire Vampire closed this Jun 1, 2023
@Vampire Vampire deleted the verify-method-in-method-invocation branch June 1, 2023 18:19
@Vampire
Copy link
Member Author

Vampire commented Jun 1, 2023

Replace by #1681

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant