-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 38
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Segfaults when some programs in program_noproxy don't exist #5
Comments
|
Yes...I'm also using route table 100. Maybe you can check the number before use? |
Yes, it should be this way. However with dynamic table, status have to saved between running this script. So I changed it to a more uncommon number for now. Lines 72 to 74 in a4628cf
|
Maybe you can put them in the config file so every one will have a look at them before starting. |
Now table, fwmark, and mark_newin are exposed to config |
The config looks like this. All options are optional. {
"port": 12345,
"program_noproxy": ["v2ray", "qv2ray"],
"program_proxy": [],
"cgroup_noproxy": ["/system.slice/v2ray.service"],
"cgroup_proxy": [],
"enable_gateway": false,
"enable_dns": true,
"enable_udp": true,
"enable_tcp": true,
"enable_ipv4": true,
"enable_ipv6": true,
"table": 10007,
"fwmark": 39283,
"mark_newin": 39271
} |
PS: it still didn't work at all after I fixed this. I'll try another way than this.
PPS: it deleted my own route to make my own TPROXY stop working....
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: