Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on Jan 24, 2024. It is now read-only.

How to distinguish the secreted signaling pattern——paracrine/autocrine signaling interactions #4

Closed
BeyondMyPast228 opened this issue Jul 29, 2020 · 4 comments

Comments

@BeyondMyPast228
Copy link

Hi,
Thanks for your answer to my previous question. As I was running CellChat, I became aware of a problem. Can I know if the type of interactions in my single-cell data is autocrine or paracrine? How can I tell them apart?
I sincerely hope to get your reply.

@sqjin
Copy link
Owner

sqjin commented Jul 29, 2020

@BeyondMyPast228 First, our customized hierarchical plot allows easy-to-identified paracrine vs. autocrine signaling links; second, the signaling role plot also can tell you based on the sender and receiver measures; third, you can also access the communication probability matrix via cellchat@netP$prob or cellchat@net$prob, where the non-zero elements in the diagonal indicate the autocrine signaling.

@BeyondMyPast228
Copy link
Author

Thanks your answer.

@guokai8
Copy link

guokai8 commented Jul 31, 2020

Hi @sqjin, so in the hierarchical plot, the left part is autocrine or the right part is autocrine?

@sqjin
Copy link
Owner

sqjin commented Aug 1, 2020

@guokai8 I am not very clear what you are referring to. But the link from one solid circle (source) with one open circle (target) with the same colors is the autocrine signaling.

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants