__repr__

[Skybound1]

The return value of __repr__ should look like a valid Python expression that could be passed into eval() to create an object with the same value (or as close as)

https://docs.python.org/3/library/functions.html#repr

[trickeydan]

Upon some implementation, I'm uncertain that implementing __repr__ for everything is actually useful. The default python one is useful enough, and we cannot test it properly either as it always boils down to an object at a memory address eventually.

[kierdavis]

Makes sense. We have __str__ for most if not all things anyway. I'm happy for this to be closed as a wontfix.