Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

CI: vanilla CO-RE BPF vs custom CO-RE BPF #1459

Open
erthalion opened this issue Dec 5, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

CI: vanilla CO-RE BPF vs custom CO-RE BPF #1459

erthalion opened this issue Dec 5, 2023 · 0 comments
Labels
ci-improvement Anything related to how CI pipeline behaves optional Nice to have feature, but not a blocker

Comments

@erthalion
Copy link
Contributor

erthalion commented Dec 5, 2023

It's necessary to have an internal toggle to be able to switch between custom &
vanilla CO-RE BPF implementation. We could use this to cross-verify CI results
at the deeper level than just matching process name or opened port: all stable
resources could be compared, e.g. actual fds, uid/gid, sinsp event sequence
etc.

Investigate if it's possible to implement such comparison within the framework
of current CI with minimal changes.

Part of #1320

@erthalion erthalion added optional Nice to have feature, but not a blocker ci-improvement Anything related to how CI pipeline behaves labels Dec 5, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ci-improvement Anything related to how CI pipeline behaves optional Nice to have feature, but not a blocker
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant