You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
An alternative context is available at https://w3id.org/ore/context-ore, which defines ORE terms with the ore: prefix. This context MAY be used instead, for instance to avoid naming conflicts when including the ORE context in another JSON-LD context.
Should this be included? The reason I made it was thinking of the case of other people importing the ORE context within an application-specific context. We might not want to hijack non-prefixed names like "describes".
If it is to be included, does the text need more explanation on to when it should and should not be used?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Should this be included? The reason I made it was thinking of the case of other people importing the ORE context within an application-specific context. We might not want to hijack non-prefixed names like "describes".
If it is to be included, does the text need more explanation on to when it should and should not be used?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: