Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should we provide a prefixed version of context? #6

Open
stain opened this issue Jun 11, 2014 · 0 comments
Open

Should we provide a prefixed version of context? #6

stain opened this issue Jun 11, 2014 · 0 comments

Comments

@stain
Copy link
Owner

stain commented Jun 11, 2014

An alternative context is available at https://w3id.org/ore/context-ore, which defines ORE terms with the ore: prefix. This context MAY be used instead, for instance to avoid naming conflicts when including the ORE context in another JSON-LD context.

Should this be included? The reason I made it was thinking of the case of other people importing the ORE context within an application-specific context. We might not want to hijack non-prefixed names like "describes".

If it is to be included, does the text need more explanation on to when it should and should not be used?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

1 participant