-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 368
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Feature/improve nuts diagnostic #352
Changes from 2 commits
2ae82f8
b88cf01
f226209
bc55916
4e1cfcf
964b518
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change |
---|---|---|
|
@@ -2147,8 +2147,9 @@ \section{Running the Print Command} | |
accept_stat__ 0.88 5.6e-03 1.8e-01 0.51 0.95 1.0 1000 16881 1.00 | ||
stepsize__ 0.30 1.3e-15 8.9e-16 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.50 8.5 1.00 | ||
treedepth__ 1.4 2.6e-02 8.0e-01 0.00 1.0 2.0 946 15978 1.00 | ||
n_divergent__ 1.4 0.0e+00 0.0e+00 0.00 0.0 0.0 1000 16949 1.00 | ||
alpha 17 1.8e+00 2.5e+01 1.9 9.5 50 181 3054 1.00 | ||
beta 10 1.1e+00 1.4e+01 1.2 6.2 31 181 3057 1.0 | ||
beta 10 1.1e+00 1.4e+01 1.2 6.2 31 181 3057 1.00 | ||
|
||
Samples were drawn using hmc with nuts. | ||
For each parameter, N_Eff is a crude measure of effective sample size, | ||
|
@@ -2168,7 +2169,10 @@ \section{Running the Print Command} | |
step size used by NUTS in its Hamiltonian simulation, and | ||
\code{treedepth\_\_} is the depth of tree used by NUTS, which is the | ||
log (base 2) of the number of leapfrog steps taken during the | ||
Hamiltonian simulation. }\label{bin-print-eg.figure} | ||
Hamiltonian simulation. \code{n\_divergent\_\_} gives the number | ||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I used "divergent" as an adjective to the iteration "as in divergent iteration", "not divergence iteration" but I'm happy to switch it if people would prefer a different notation. On Nov 11, 2013, at 9:59 PM, Daniel Lee notifications@github.com wrote:
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I was just looking at consistent usage. The code (or at least the tests you have) indicates that Feel free to go with one or the other. It's ok to use "divergent" as an adjective too, but if the code is generating There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Ah, sorry, misread that. Branch updated to be consistent. On Nov 11, 2013, at 10:38 PM, Daniel Lee notifications@github.com wrote:
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. +1 for "divergent" On 11/11/13, 5:19 PM, Michael Betancourt wrote:
|
||
of leapfrog iterations with diverging error; because NUTS terminates | ||
at the first divergent iteration this should always be either 0 or 1.} | ||
\label{bin-print-eg.figure} | ||
\end{figure} | ||
%\end{quote} | ||
% | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Should this be
n_divergence__
?