-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 142
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Which other data do you need in the plots? #18
Comments
Some of them might be beyond the scope of this package.
BTW, I attempted to plot the loss curve at batch-level granularity. I found it is easy to do so when training, but kinda difficult to do it in evaluation stage. Can you provide an example? I'm using PyTorch. |
Use can set matplotlib style https://matplotlib.org/tutorials/introductory/customizing.html. For more/different styles, use https://seaborn.pydata.org/tutorial/aesthetics.html#seaborn-figure-styles.
Interesting idea. I will consider that.
Not sure. It only works if it knows the total number of batches/epochs.
You can add this data with in the
Was thinking about it.
I don't recommend that. Plot-drawing is a costly step, and this thing is likely to severely impact performance. For evaluation - I am not sure if you want that. These plots work well for the same x axis for both train and eval. |
Hi @stared thanks for this great project! One nice feature would be if one could pass the PlotLossesKeras constructor a parameter |
@duhaime A good idea, struggled with the same thing myself. My idea was to specify some "rescaling" options, e.g. ignoring the first |
When I try using
However, initializing gives the error above. |
The skip_first feature seemed removed after 0.5 release. |
Is there a new feature added that does the same thing? |
I am thinking what is the best amount of data displayed?
Maybe it is good to add other features - like the numerical value of current metrics, or maximal values.
Though, I don't want to make it too cluttered. So, I am interested in your feedback what is missing (or what you would consider more a distraction).
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: