-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 791
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Comment Reward Beneficiaries #773
Comments
Should work for comments also. Especially if #774 will be implemented. Comments to the same post can be published from different apps. Developers should be rewarded for all efforts. |
Yes. All content will be eligible for this. |
this will bring so many new possibilities. ❤️ |
The
Beneficiaries can be set when there are no votes on a comment. Setting options of any kind should be done in the same transaction that the comment is created in. Processing of the beneficiaries during payout will go in order of the vector and whatever is left goes to the author. The sum of weights cannot exceed |
Testing is waiting on #659 to be merged. |
… order to prevent duplicate entries #773
… order to prevent duplicate entries #773
… order to prevent duplicate entries #773
… order to prevent duplicate entries #773
Merged |
From GolosChain#102 As a comment option, authors should be able to specify a number of beneficiaries to receive a percentage of the rewards and the percent of the potential liquid rewards to receive as Steem Power. Unallocated rewards by default go to the author as they currently do. Inspired by steemit#773 and supported by the community. ---- This commit is a cumulative patch taken from upstream commits: git diff 91f5113..upstream/102-comment-reward-beneficiaries Unrelated changes has been omitted. Unittests in original commits was broken, but was fixed in next commits. I used these fixes.
As a comment option, authors should be able to specify a number of beneficiaries to receive a percentage of the rewards and the percent of the potential liquid rewards to receive as Steem Power. Unallocated rewards by default go to the author as they currently do. Inspired by steemit#773 and supported by the community. Commit contains fix miscalculation when paying beneficiaries steemit#909 . As described in steemit#2162, 8 beneficiniries is small, that is why limit is 64.
As a comment option, authors should be able to specify a number of beneficiaries to receive a percentage of the rewards and the percent of the potential liquid rewards to receive as Steem Power. Unallocated rewards by default go to the author as they currently do. Inspired by steemit#773 and supported by the community. Commit contains fix miscalculation when paying beneficiaries steemit#909 . As described in steemit#2162, 8 beneficiniries is small, that is why limit is 64.
As a comment option, authors should be able to specify a number of beneficiaries to receive a percentage of the rewards and the percent of the potential liquid rewards to receive as Steem Power. Unallocated rewards by default go to the author as they currently do. Inspired by steemit#773 and supported by the community. Commit contains fix miscalculation when paying beneficiaries steemit#909 . As described in steemit#2162, 8 beneficiniries is small, that is why limit is 64.
As a comment option, authors should be able to specify a number of beneficiaries to receive a percentage of the rewards and the percent of the potential liquid rewards to receive as Steem Power. Unallocated rewards by default go to the author as they currently do.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: