-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 793
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
0.17.0rc1: latter beneficiaries will get less pay #909
Milestone
Comments
mvandeberg
added this to the Hardfork 17 - Protocol Cleanup and Simplification milestone
Mar 7, 2017
mvandeberg
pushed a commit
that referenced
this issue
Mar 7, 2017
Merged |
afalaleev
added a commit
to GolosChain/golos
that referenced
this issue
Feb 28, 2018
As a comment option, authors should be able to specify a number of beneficiaries to receive a percentage of the rewards and the percent of the potential liquid rewards to receive as Steem Power. Unallocated rewards by default go to the author as they currently do. Inspired by steemit#773 and supported by the community. Commit contains fix miscalculation when paying beneficiaries steemit#909 . As described in steemit#2162, 8 beneficiniries is small, that is why limit is 64.
afalaleev
added a commit
to GolosChain/golos
that referenced
this issue
Feb 28, 2018
As a comment option, authors should be able to specify a number of beneficiaries to receive a percentage of the rewards and the percent of the potential liquid rewards to receive as Steem Power. Unallocated rewards by default go to the author as they currently do. Inspired by steemit#773 and supported by the community. Commit contains fix miscalculation when paying beneficiaries steemit#909 . As described in steemit#2162, 8 beneficiniries is small, that is why limit is 64.
afalaleev
added a commit
to GolosChain/golos
that referenced
this issue
Mar 1, 2018
As a comment option, authors should be able to specify a number of beneficiaries to receive a percentage of the rewards and the percent of the potential liquid rewards to receive as Steem Power. Unallocated rewards by default go to the author as they currently do. Inspired by steemit#773 and supported by the community. Commit contains fix miscalculation when paying beneficiaries steemit#909 . As described in steemit#2162, 8 beneficiniries is small, that is why limit is 64.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
According to this code in
cashout_comment_helper(...)
of datase.cppAfter paid out each beneficiaries,
benefactor_tokens
will be deducted fromauthor_tokens
, so next beneficiary will be paid less even if with sameweight
.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: