-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Stash is not showing untracked files #859
Comments
Hi @rsalmei, Thank you for sharing this feedback with the Sublime Merge team. The topology you see here is actually how Git stores untracked files (as a separate ref). We aim to keep a 1-1 mapping between refs and their contents. That being said, we could definitely do more to make this clear via labels and links. Thanks, |
see also: #314 |
I understand @dpjohnst, thank you. On sublime merge, when I look into my oldest stash I see: On the other hand, when I look it with GitUp I see: You can clearly see there's missing content in smerge, and I would rather not have to think about if there's hidden content somewhere else... |
I completely agree. Tower also combines tracked and untracked files, and it's so much nicer to use. I don't think it's helpful to stick precisely to git internals at the expense of user experience. |
As of 03-Mar-2021, git now allows It would be nice if SublimeMerge did something better here. I nearly dropped a stash because SM showed me nothing and I almost forgot that it was nothing BUT untracked files. At least git cmd gives me an easy way to check but I hate leaving the smooth silkiness that is SM (yes, trying a little flattery here!) |
Any progress on this? It is harder to review which stash have the files you added, we need to review them one by one by popping or applying, which is very troublesome in some cases with high number of changed files and long list of stashes |
Problem description
Git enables us to stash untracked files, but they are not easily seen in sublime merge.
I just find out that they are in the third parent commit, so they could easily be shown (GitUp does show them).
More information: https://stackoverflow.com/questions/12681529/in-git-is-there-a-way-to-show-untracked-stashed-files-without-applying-the-stas
Preferred solution
Sublime Merge could merge the diff of tracked files and the untracked files, thus showing the complete picture of a stash. The way it does now is misleading, not showing all the files that were actually stashed.
Alternatives
It could at least include a button or make it clear there are more files not shown there.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: