added the ability to have possessive/genitive citations (e.g., Pacer and Suchow's paper on proselint) #59
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
…w's paper on proselint)
|
I didn't add the xstring extension to handle ending "s"es because I didn't want to introduce another dependency. But if that's ok, then I'll add that as well. |
|
hmmm not sure why that broke |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Add the ability to cite papers in a possessive form (which is otherwise impossible to do with natbib).
Fix drawn from: http://tex.stackexchange.com/questions/125690/bibtex-and-genitive-possessive-s-the-proper-way-to-obtain-kurans-1989-mo
really this should be built into natbib, but that hasn't been touched since 2010, so I'm not holding my breath, and I don't want us to be shipping our own incompatible version of natbib, so this seemed like the most sensible place to put it.