Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support more exit nodes #6

Closed
eenblam opened this issue Apr 18, 2018 · 2 comments
Closed

Support more exit nodes #6

eenblam opened this issue Apr 18, 2018 · 2 comments

Comments

@eenblam
Copy link
Member

eenblam commented Apr 18, 2018

Right now, we have a list of whitelisted exit node IPs, but the monitor only thinks about the latest update it received. We can refactor to account for multiple exit nodes in how we relay results.

@eenblam
Copy link
Member Author

eenblam commented May 13, 2018

@bennlich @jhpoelen thoughts on this? I implemented a simple version that just adds up the number of routes and gateways for each exit node, but that doesn't really make sense and is misleading.

I am keying on alive-${ip}, so we can just look at each one individually. If that sounds like a good start, I can hammer it out.

@bennlich
Copy link
Collaborator

bennlich commented May 15, 2018

Yeah--I think a good place to start would be to show one table per exit node. I think the summary at the top can be thought of as a table summary (it essentially counts the rows in the table). (Related: we don't really want/need a separate POST route for the summary info--with a dump of an exit node's routing table, the monitor has everything it needs to render a summary).

After we have a table/summary per exit node, we could put a big mesh overview summary of tables on top of that. Maybe something like, # of live exit nodes, # of independent meshes, # of unique gateway IPs, # of unique mesh IPs.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants