Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Document Solr and Stanford::Mods normalization methods #76

Closed
jgreben opened this issue Apr 10, 2017 · 5 comments
Closed

Document Solr and Stanford::Mods normalization methods #76

jgreben opened this issue Apr 10, 2017 · 5 comments
Assignees

Comments

@jgreben
Copy link

jgreben commented Apr 10, 2017

Document of provide a link to an existing document about how Solr intrinsically handles some punctuation, and also about what stanford-mods provides for us in terms of normalization.

@ndushay
Copy link
Contributor

ndushay commented Apr 10, 2017

Sadly the documentation is in the stanford-mods code. :-P

@ndushay
Copy link
Contributor

ndushay commented Apr 19, 2017

Given the new consul document about SearchWorks indexing: https://consul.stanford.edu/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=156860714

Can we close this?

@jgreben
Copy link
Author

jgreben commented Apr 19, 2017

👍 I added a link to the schema.xml file and an additional bullet point.

- Look it up in Solr schema.xml.  How the Solr field processes the raw text at index time informs the minimum processing for the field value being sent to Solr.
-- Here you will find how a particular data field is modified/normalized for Solr indexing purposes.
-- is it single valued or multi-valued?
-- how is it modified by Solr processing?
--- tokenized, etc.

@ndushay
Copy link
Contributor

ndushay commented Apr 19, 2017

cool! Does that mean we can close this issue? I also added more info on where to look for code in solrmarc-sw.

@jgreben
Copy link
Author

jgreben commented Apr 20, 2017 via email

@ndushay ndushay assigned jgreben and ndushay and unassigned ndushay Apr 20, 2017
@ndushay ndushay closed this as completed Apr 20, 2017
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants