You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
I have 2 use cases where I want to have non-integer api versions
I don't like leaking my versions to the outside world. I often use dates or codenames for versions. e.g. v20130701 (which I could still use as a big number). Kind of like how Heroku differentiates their stack versions (cedar vs bamboo)
I do few integrations with big partners and I'd like to have them on a custom version/endpoint. If my big partners are BigCorp and Acme, I can build separate versions for each of them, but share everything underneath -- just the path is different initially (were the version method in the controller to accept an array of version names). Then, down the road, if one of them wants a change, I can customize just for one of them because they're already on their own version without affecting the other.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
I'm open to the suggestion - as long as it's possible to maintain consistency with the existing one.
Unfortunately, I'm incredibly busy at the moment with work, so I can't yet implement it myself - but if you'd be willing to put a patch together, I'd be happy to review it and likely pull it in.
I see in the routing code
I'd like to have non-integer version names.
I have 2 use cases where I want to have non-integer api versions
version
method in the controller to accept an array of version names). Then, down the road, if one of them wants a change, I can customize just for one of them because they're already on their own version without affecting the other.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: