Give focus to another swaylock surface when output is disconnected #2760
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
* Have multiple outputs * Launch swaylock * Unplug an output (possibly has to be the last "connected" one) * The swaylock surface on the remaining output would not respond to key events This was happening because when the output destroys, focus was not given to the other swaylock surface. This patch makes focus be transferred to another surface owned by the same Wayland client, but only if input was inhibited by the surface being destroyed, and only if it's in the overlay layer. I figure it's best to be overly specific and relax the requirements later if needed. This patch removes a check in seat_set_focus_surface which was preventing focus from being passed from a layer surface to any other surface. I don't know of a use case for this check, but it's possible that this change could produce issues.
ddevault
approved these changes
Oct 4, 2018
emersion
approved these changes
Oct 4, 2018
|
Thanks! |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This was happening because when the output destroys, focus was not given to the other swaylock surface.
This patch makes focus be transferred to another layer surface owned by the same Wayland client, but only if input was inhibited by the surface being destroyed, and only if it's in the overlay layer. I figure it's best to be overly specific and relax the requirements later if needed.
This patch removes a check in
seat_set_focus_surfacewhich was preventing focus from being passed from a layer surface to any other surface. I don't know of a use case for this check, but it's possible that this change could produce issues.