-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.4k
Commit
This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository.
merged branch stloyd/repeatedtype (PR #1453)
Commits ------- 67c33a8 Rebased with master, and fixed wrong behavior with proper tests coverage f8a6a4b Be sure that both fields have same value for required option in RepeatedType 0679220 Additional test coverage for changes in RepeatedType b23d47d moved options test form from class->method scope 5fe5556 fixed accidental permission change a969434 [Form] fixed CS, merged options, added tests 8819db3 [Form] Allow setting different options to repeating fields Discussion ---------- [2.1] [Form] Allow setting different options at RepeatedType fields This an test covered version of #1348 (rebased with master). --------------------------------------------------------------------------- by stloyd at 2011/06/27 04:18:19 -0700 @fabpot What do you think about this ? I'm just not sure that we should allow setting `required` per field, IMO better would be forcing this option from default `$options['options']` and ignore that field in `$options['first_options']` and/or `$options['second_options']`. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- by stloyd at 2011/07/02 00:00:04 -0700 @fabpot ping. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- by fabpot at 2011/07/06 05:45:56 -0700 Let's discuss this new feature for 2.1. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- by stloyd at 2011/08/24 01:12:59 -0700 Rebased with master. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- by stof at 2011/09/04 05:02:42 -0700 @fabpot What do you think about this feature ? It is now time to discuss it :) --------------------------------------------------------------------------- by fabpot at 2011/09/22 00:18:29 -0700 Tests do not pass. --------------------------------------------------------------------------- by stloyd at 2011/09/24 01:54:42 -0700 @fabpot Should be ok now.
- Loading branch information
Showing
4 changed files
with
113 additions
and
9 deletions.
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters