-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 94
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Evaluate effectiveness of dynamic superinstructions #282
Comments
Regarding enabling offline macro-op fusion, in the context of RISC-V, which is a fixed-width ISA, certain operations are split into multiple instructions. For hardware RISC-V implementations, these instruction pairs are automatically combined at runtime by the CPU as code runs. However, we can perform this fusion offline, simplifying the process. This approach offers several benefits, including improved tool processing and easier recompilation by the instruction set simulator. Importantly, it is reversible, allowing us to revert to normal RISC-V code if needed. Essentially, it provides an alternative, simpler way to express the same functionality. With the help of dynamic superinstruction, offline macro-op fusion can be achieved in a more concrete way. |
Reference: Binary Translation Using Peephole Superoptimizers
Souper is a superoptimizer for LLVM IR. It uses an SMT solver to help identify missing peephole optimizations in LLVM's midend optimizers. BOLT is a post-link optimizer developed to speed up large applications. It achieves the improvements by optimizing application's code layout based on execution profile gathered by sampling profiler, such as Linux perf tool. |
Superinstructions are well-known techniques for improving the performance of interpreters. Superinstructions eliminate jumps between VM operations (interpreter dispatch) and enable more optimizations in the merged code. Adopting an approach to work with dynamic superinstructions in a RISC-V emulator offers an intriguing blend of traditional JIT compilation and interpreter-based execution, and profiler can recommend superinstructions. This strategy could capitalize on the strengths of both methodologies. Let's evaluate the effectiveness of this approach based on several key factors:
However, this approach also introduces additional complexity and requires careful consideration of resource utilization and security implications. The effectiveness of this approach largely depends on the specific requirements and constraints of the emulation environment, as well as the ability to effectively balance the trade-offs involved.
Reference:
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: