Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Using CTCF chip-exo without input #37

Closed
re2srm opened this issue Feb 22, 2024 · 5 comments
Closed

Using CTCF chip-exo without input #37

re2srm opened this issue Feb 22, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@re2srm
Copy link

re2srm commented Feb 22, 2024

Hello,

I have CTCF chip-exo data and unlike chip-seq it doesnt have an input sample. I have generated the bigwig file but cannot run ctcf_norm.sh to normalize it as I dont have an input sample. Can I use the bigwig file directly without normalizing it?

I do have a chip-seq input sample from the same cell line but I am not sure if I should use that for normalizing the chip-exo data.

Thanks

@tanjimin
Copy link
Owner

The ChIP-seq has to be normalized with log2fc w.r.t. input. You can use the input sample from the same cell line as input data and see how it goes.

@re2srm
Copy link
Author

re2srm commented Feb 22, 2024

Thanks. Will try that.

@re2srm re2srm closed this as completed Feb 22, 2024
@re2srm
Copy link
Author

re2srm commented Feb 23, 2024

I had another question about the atac-seq input files. I used the seqnslide atac pipeline to generate the atac bigwig file for my cell line. But I just noticed that the atac_pipeline.sh in the preprocessing folder subsamples 40M reads before running the pipeline. Is it a required step? My atac sample actually has less than 40M reads.

@tanjimin
Copy link
Owner

Yes 40 million subsample is a required normalization step.

@re2srm
Copy link
Author

re2srm commented Feb 29, 2024

Hi, another question about the ctcf input data. When I normalize my ctcf against input, there are regions where the log2fc w.r.t input is negative. I also did this for some published ctcf data and got the same result. Were your normalized bigwig files similar? Or should I remove the negative values from the bigwig before using them as input. Thanks

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants