Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The Tests Pipeline Is Failing on my fork #2191

Closed
1 of 2 tasks
atharva-2001 opened this issue Jan 19, 2023 · 7 comments
Closed
1 of 2 tasks

The Tests Pipeline Is Failing on my fork #2191

atharva-2001 opened this issue Jan 19, 2023 · 7 comments

Comments

@atharva-2001
Copy link
Member

Describe the bug

The test pipeline is failing.
To check:

  • Link to the failed workflow.
  • Link to the branch.

To Reproduce

Run the tests workflow.

Screenshots

System

  • OS:

    • GNU/Linux
    • macOS
  • Environment (conda list):

Additional context

@epassaro
Copy link
Member

The test pipeline is failing on your fork. That's because your master branch is 179 commits behind upstream.

@atharva-2001
Copy link
Member Author

But the branch on which the workflow failed is synced with the master branch on the TARDIS repository, right?

@epassaro
Copy link
Member

I don't know, the link is not correct I guess. I assume you can see your branch but I don't.

@epassaro
Copy link
Member

Are working with a new atomic file?

MD5SUM and UUID1 signatures are no longer encoded in new Carsus atomic files, I think that's the problem.

@atharva-2001
Copy link
Member Author

atharva-2001 commented Jan 19, 2023

I'm afraid I don't think I am, I just created a copy of the master branch and the workflow failed. If you can't see the second link, maybe try this one?

@epassaro
Copy link
Member

epassaro commented Jan 19, 2023

The pipeline passed on the master branch.

EDIT: I'll take a look. Maybe it's ok to edit the issue title mentioning your fork explicitly 👍

@atharva-2001 atharva-2001 changed the title The Tests Pipeline Is Failing The Tests Pipeline Is Failing on my fork Jan 25, 2023
@chvogl
Copy link
Contributor

chvogl commented Sep 26, 2023

I guess this is no longer relevant @atharva-2001? Closing for now.

@chvogl chvogl closed this as completed Sep 26, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants