-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update emberjs example #63
Comments
Other deficiencies:
|
The Ember+Require app just landed in 1b65322 @stas Would you be interested in getting the non-require version completed? I think there could be a good amount of reuse. //cc @addyosmani |
I could take a look if there's nobody else interested in picking it up. |
👍 |
I think the non-AMD/Require version wouldn't be too difficult to complete. Always happy for @tomdale to review anything Ember related going into this project, just to be on the safe side :) |
@stas Still interested? We would really like to get an up to date version into our 1.0 release 😃 |
Hey, sorry guys I'm a bit busy lately. When you were planning to release 1.0, lets see if we can sync. |
Np, I absolutely understand ;) We've set the release date to june 20th, which means we'll need it some days before that. |
20th looks great, my holidays start early june, so it seems doable. |
@stas Sounds good! :D |
I've got bandwidth to work on this so I'm going to wrap it up this evening and hopefully have @sindresorhus review :) |
If you dare :p |
I plan on submitting this while you're asleep. It's the safest way to sneak in a merge ;D |
Sounds cool :) |
I never sleep! |
@sindresorhus could you review https://github.com/addyosmani/todomvc/tree/emberjs? If you're happy with it, let me know and I'll pull it into master, otherwise address any issues you notice :) |
Prepare... Ya, there are a few comments :p
|
@sindresorhus thanks for the review. I'll address those! On the last point, I think we need to decide whether we want to enforce splitting up of applications or keeping it optional. I was looking at the Backbone app last night and remember that it currently also keeps all of its logic in a single file (but of course can be split out). Thoughts? |
Even though not necessary in our small Todo app, I think we should enforce some good practices. |
+1 on splitting into multiple files. I think that making these as "realistic" as possible is important. Every web app developer I know is using a tool for file management these days. |
Updated in https://github.com/addyosmani/todomvc/tree/emberjs:
Missing: Trim input on edit and remove if empty @tomdale there's currently one issue with the app that I'm trying to wrap my head around. We're working under the same namespaces as the RequireJS version of the app, however, now that IIFEs are being used the binding context for content seems to be a little messed up. e.g the remaining and completed item counts now only seem to update correctly on page refresh but not when the app is interacted with. Do you think you might be able to take a look to see what I'm doing wrong? :) |
There's a new pull request #202 to include routing support. @addyosmani please check if there are any other issues like the one with counts. |
@sindresorhus I've just patched the trim on edit behaviour and the remove if empty should be working fine too. Could you do a final review on the emberjs branch so I can merge into master if we're happy with it? :) |
@addyosmani Almost, only thing left is that the filters are not selected when clicked. All should be selected by default. The others should be selected when the hash changes and on load. |
ping |
@sindresorhus Tried fixing this, but ran into some roadblocks. I've pinged a few Ember devs including @tomdale but I think they might be swamped. If no one is able to help resolve, I'll give this another shot tomorrow morning. |
Closing as routing was fixed in #231 |
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: