Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Implement SharedArrayBuffer & Atomics #769

Closed
wants to merge 15 commits into from
Closed

Commits on Feb 1, 2017

  1. Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    df65e7d View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history
  2. Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    7df8ec7 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history
  3. Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    3fcbfd7 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history
  4. Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    0378ed6 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history
  5. Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    034da0d View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history
  6. Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    f9e0fcd View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history
  7. Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    cc5a78a View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history
  8. Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    fa85a87 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history
  9. Normative: memory-order constraint fix

    syg authored and bterlson committed Feb 1, 2017
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    dfafcd8 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history
  10. Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    f58f32d View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history
  11. Normative: integrate SharedArrayBuffer proposal sections 6.3.4 to 6.3…

    ….6 as notes at the end of the memory model section
    syg authored and bterlson committed Feb 1, 2017
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    b0d222f View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history
  12. Editorial: fix section id for Atomics.xor

    syg authored and bterlson committed Feb 1, 2017
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    7f3ede5 View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history
  13. Normative: add Atomics[@@toStringTag]

    syg authored and bterlson committed Feb 1, 2017
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    a845dcf View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history
  14. Editorial: fix markup (#772)

    syg authored and bterlson committed Feb 1, 2017
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    de25d0e View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history
  15. Editorial: SAB editorial tweaks (#782)

    * Editorial: put Memory Model notes in their own subclause
    
    The emu-clause for "Memory Model" contains some introductory stuff,
    followed by a bunch of sub-emu-clauses,
    followed by 3 emu-notes.
    Now, although these notes are (in the HTML)
    children of the Memory Model clause,
    I suspect that when rendered,
    they'll *look* like they're part of
    the last of the sub-clauses ("Data Race Freedom"),
    which you probably don't want.
    
    So, to prevent this, I put the three notes in their own sub-clause.
    
    * Editorial: in <li> with block items, put inline items in <p>
    
    It's unusual (at least in this document)
    for a <li> to contain both inline items (<em> and text) and block items (<p>).
    Embed the inline items in a <p>.
    
    (Also, adjust the linebreaking and indenting accordingly.)
    
    * Editorial: Add </li> tags
    
    * Editorial: insert missing </emu-xref> tag
    
    * Editorial: fix misspelled </emu-xref> tag
    
    * Editorial: insert missing close-backticks
    
    * Editorial: put missing underscores around metavariables
    
    * Editorial: put missing asterisks around "true"
    
    * Editorial: put missing backticks around string literal
    
    * Editorial: insert missing "that"
    
    * Editorial: change "the List" to "a List" in a few places
    
    * Editorial: various wording tweaks re empty List
    
    "the empty list" -> "a new empty List" or "an empty List" as appropriate
    
    "an empty List"  -> "a new empty List"
    
    * Editorial: remove asterisks from *0* and *1*
    
    For one thing, 0 (per se) doesn't exist as an ES value.
    More generally, spec algorithms can use abstract/mathematical integers
    without having to relate them to Number values.
    
    * Editorial: add "Record" to anonymous record constructors
    
    (Should maybe be "Chosen Value Record".)
    
    * Editorial: delete pointless Zero-Width Joiner
    
    * Editorial: remove extra indent on 2 algorithm steps
    
    * Editorial: insert and delete a few spaces
    
    * Editorial: insert comma before "then"
    
    * Editorial: misc tweaks to algorithm wording
    
    ... mostly for consistency
    
    * Editorial: change "a event" to "an event"
    
    * Editorial: disambiguate a dangling else
    
    This is a case of "dangling else" (or "dangling otherwise"),
    and it's not obvious which "if" the "otherwise" associates with.
    
    I've rewritten it to remove the ambiguity.
    Please check whether I got the intent right.
    (If not, you might want to rewrite as multiple steps,
    so that the logic is clear.)
    jmdyck authored and bterlson committed Feb 1, 2017
    Configuration menu
    Copy the full SHA
    d617a6e View commit details
    Browse the repository at this point in the history