Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Spec improvements #1018

Merged
merged 2 commits into from Oct 20, 2020
Merged

Spec improvements #1018

merged 2 commits into from Oct 20, 2020

Conversation

ptomato
Copy link
Collaborator

@ptomato ptomato commented Oct 20, 2020

A couple of improvements I made while working on ZonedDateTime spec.

If this operation takes epoch nanoseconds instead of a Temporal.Instant
instance, then it can be reused for ZonedDateTime.compare().
GetTemporalDateTimeFor also has a calendar argument, so this was a bug in
the spec.
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Oct 20, 2020

Codecov Report

Merging #1018 into main will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #1018   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   94.23%   94.23%           
=======================================
  Files          18       18           
  Lines        6284     6284           
  Branches      932      932           
=======================================
  Hits         5922     5922           
  Misses        355      355           
  Partials        7        7           
Flag Coverage Δ
#test262 46.38% <ø> (ø)
#tests 90.23% <ø> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.


Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update b0ac231...35f71da. Read the comment docs.

@Ms2ger Ms2ger merged commit e792594 into main Oct 20, 2020
@Ms2ger Ms2ger deleted the spec-improvements-for-zoneddatetime branch October 20, 2020 09:26
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants