You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
The discussion in Issue 19
(http://code.google.com/p/applecore/issues/detail?id=29) makes me realize that
we'll have many cases where "what data users would like" and "what data
publishers can provide" are very different. The Apple Core guidelines do have
to cater to the lowest common denominator, so everyone can publish data.
But I'm thinking that it might be useful (and fun!) to have one or more
"standards of excellence" or "certificates" for published data. For example: my
data is published according to APPLE CORE GOLD!
The "Apple Core Gold" standard would be assigned only to data that were
published following the most strict guidelines in Apple Core, for example
eventDates are formatted according to ISO 8601:2004(E). I've created a page
where we can list the conditions for this standard at:
http://code.google.com/p/applecore/wiki/AppleCoreGold
That way, we don't alienate collections who cannot follow the most strict
guidelines AND there's an incentive for publishers who can, improving the
overall quality and usefulness of the data.
To keep things simple, I'm also thinking the following:
1) The standard is be self-assigned: in the open sharing environment of the web
it is rather easy to debunk it (followed by eternal shame for the publisher,
unless they step things up). We could also do it peer reviewed or done by a
trusted registry, but that's a bit too complicated.
2) You need to comply with ALL the conditions of Apple Core Gold to obtain it.
That way it can be referenced: a URL to the Apple Core Gold page informs the
data user what he/she can expect. An Apple Core Gold 88% seems to complicated.
Things I haven't figured out yet (this idea is still rather new):
1) Where in the metadata (DarwinCore or EML) do we record this? Preferably we
record the URL of the Apple Core Page. If we need to create a new field, it's
similar in function to georeferenceProtocol.
2) Do we need Apple Core Silver, Apple Core Bronze, Apple Core and maybe an
Apple Core Rotten?
Let me know what you think!
Original issue reported on code.google.com by peter.de...@gmail.com on 10 Jun 2011 at 4:32
Original issue reported on code.google.com by
peter.de...@gmail.com
on 10 Jun 2011 at 4:32The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: