Claiming a reserved name for the router

[Cryptophobia]

From @pixeleet on April 4, 2017 13:24

router. (or maybe deis-router.) becoming the router's official address, much as deis.<domain is the address of the controller and deis-builder. is the address of the builder. We'd have to add router (or deis-router) to the list of reserved names in the controller.

Copied from original issue: deis/router#334

[Cryptophobia]

From @krancour on April 4, 2017 13:38

As noted in the thread this convo forked from (#333), this is really a formality of sorts, since any address that resolves to the router but doesn't match any routable application will already get you to the router's default vhost. Nevertheless, I think I am in favor of this, because it's easier and more succinct to write router.<domain> (e.g. in documentation) than to write "any address that resolves to the router but doesn't match any routable application". Big 👍 on this, unless @mboersma is opposed for any reason.

[Cryptophobia]

From @krancour on April 4, 2017 13:39

@pixeleet can I assume you're also willing to PR this?