Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix links to Why Aren't PipelineResources in Beta? v0.30.x #4577

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 15, 2022

Conversation

AlanGreene
Copy link
Member

Changes

Backport #4572

Links to the "Why Aren't PipelineResources in Beta?" section in the docs
should have aren-t in the fragment instead of arent. This can be
confirmed by clicking the link icon beside the heading and checking the
browser address bar.

/kind documentation

Submitter Checklist

As the author of this PR, please check off the items in this checklist:

  • Docs included if any changes are user facing
  • Tests included if any functionality added or changed
  • Follows the commit message standard
  • Meets the Tekton contributor standards (including
    functionality, content, code)
  • Release notes block below has been filled in or deleted (only if no user facing changes)

Release Notes

/release-note-none

Backport tektoncd#4572

Links to the "Why Aren't PipelineResources in Beta?" section in the docs
should have `aren-t` in the fragment instead of `arent`. This can be
confirmed by clicking the link icon beside the heading and checking the
browser address bar.
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. labels Feb 15, 2022
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Feb 15, 2022
@AlanGreene AlanGreene changed the title Fix links to Why Aren't PipelineResources in Beta? Fix links to Why Aren't PipelineResources in Beta? v0.30.x Feb 15, 2022
Copy link
Member

@afrittoli afrittoli left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

/approve
/lgtm

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Feb 15, 2022
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: afrittoli

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Feb 15, 2022
@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit 82e5fd4 into tektoncd:release-v0.30.x Feb 15, 2022
@AlanGreene AlanGreene deleted the docs_30 branch February 15, 2022 12:17
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/documentation Categorizes issue or PR as related to documentation. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants