Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Make sure we pass the live config to the conversion webhook #6450

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Mar 29, 2023

Conversation

vdemeester
Copy link
Member

Changes

This makes sure we pass the "live" configuration to the conversion webhook. Without this, that controller doesn't see any changes on the feature-flags configmap, and thus only uses the default value.

This is a relatively big problem if some part of the conversion depends on it (which was the case for embedded-status for example) as it would cause loss of data.

Fixes #6443
Fixes possibly other "weird" behavior we've seen in the past or present (like #5964).

As this has been there for as long as we had conversion webhook, we need backport this to all supported LTS at least (0.44.0 and 0.41.0).

/kind bug
/cc @JeromeJu @lbernick @tektoncd/core-maintainers

Submitter Checklist

As the author of this PR, please check off the items in this checklist:

  • Has Docs included if any changes are user facing
  • Has Tests included if any functionality added or changed
  • Follows the commit message standard
  • Meets the Tekton contributor standards (including
    functionality, content, code)
  • Has a kind label. You can add one by adding a comment on this PR that contains /kind <type>. Valid types are bug, cleanup, design, documentation, feature, flake, misc, question, tep
  • Release notes block below has been updated with any user facing changes (API changes, bug fixes, changes requiring upgrade notices or deprecation warnings)
  • Release notes contains the string "action required" if the change requires additional action from users switching to the new release

Release Notes

Make sure the conversion webhook sees the live configmaps instead of the default ones

This makes sure we pass the "live" configuration to the conversion
webhook. Without this, that controller doesn't see any changes on the
`feature-flags` configmap, and thus only uses the default value.

This is a relatively big problem if some part of the conversion
depends on it (which was the case for `embedded-status` for example)
as it would cause loss of data.

Signed-off-by: Vincent Demeester <vdemeest@redhat.com>
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. labels Mar 29, 2023
@tekton-robot tekton-robot requested review from lbernick and a team March 29, 2023 04:09
@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. label Mar 29, 2023
@vdemeester
Copy link
Member Author

vdemeester commented Mar 29, 2023

/cherry-pick release-v0.44.x

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@vdemeester: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-v0.44.x in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-v0.44.x
/cherry-pick release-v0.41.x

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@vdemeester
Copy link
Member Author

/cherry-pick release-v0.41.x

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@vdemeester: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-v0.41.x in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-v0.41.x

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@vdemeester
Copy link
Member Author

We may as well backport this to 0.45 and 0.46 to be honest 👼🏼

@vdemeester
Copy link
Member Author

/cherry-pick release-v0.45.x

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@vdemeester: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-v0.45.x in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-v0.45.x

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@vdemeester
Copy link
Member Author

/cherry-pick release-v0.46.x

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@vdemeester: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-v0.46.x in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-v0.46.x

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@vdemeester
Copy link
Member Author

/test check-pr-has-kind-label

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@vdemeester: The specified target(s) for /test were not found.
The following commands are available to trigger required jobs:

  • /test pull-tekton-pipeline-alpha-integration-tests
  • /test pull-tekton-pipeline-beta-integration-tests
  • /test pull-tekton-pipeline-build-tests
  • /test pull-tekton-pipeline-integration-tests
  • /test tekton-pipeline-unit-tests

The following commands are available to trigger optional jobs:

  • /test pull-tekton-pipeline-go-coverage

Use /test all to run all jobs.

In response to this:

/test check-pr-has-kind-label

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@vdemeester
Copy link
Member Author

/retest

Copy link
Member

@JeromeJu JeromeJu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the speedy catch @vdemeester

@@ -158,6 +158,9 @@ func newConversionController(ctx context.Context, cmw configmap.Watcher) *contro
resolutionv1alpha1GroupVersion = resolutionv1alpha1.SchemeGroupVersion.Version
resolutionv1beta1GroupVersion = resolutionv1beta1.SchemeGroupVersion.Version
)
// Decorate contexts with the current state of the config.
store := defaultconfig.NewStore(logging.FromContext(ctx).Named("config-store"))
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do you know why in the other controllers, store.WatchConfigs is called within the inner function?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

do you know why in the other controllers, store.WatchConfigs is called within the inner function?

Ah, that's a good point, I don't know, but it should be the same for all at least 😛 So I can move it there. It works in both cases, not sure what is the reason.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's because of the difference in the outer function definitions.

Note newValidationAdmissionController takes in a parameter of type string and returns func which has two parameters (Context, Watcher) and returns controller.Impl whereas newConversionController takes two parameters (Context, Watcher) and returns controller.Impl.

func newValidationAdmissionController(name string) func(context.Context, configmap.Watcher) *controller.Impl { ... }
func newConversionController(ctx context.Context, cmw configmap.Watcher) *controller.Impl { ... }

Does it make sense?

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@pritidesai I think it does 😝

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: JeromeJu, lbernick

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 29, 2023
@pritidesai
Copy link
Member

/lgtm

@tekton-robot tekton-robot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 29, 2023
@tekton-robot tekton-robot merged commit eae5c3a into tektoncd:main Mar 29, 2023
@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@vdemeester: new pull request created: #6460

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-v0.44.x

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@vdemeester: new pull request created: #6461

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-v0.41.x

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@vdemeester: new pull request created: #6462

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-v0.45.x

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@tekton-robot
Copy link
Collaborator

@vdemeester: new pull request created: #6464

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-v0.46.x

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@vdemeester vdemeester deleted the 6437-embedded-status branch March 30, 2023 05:08
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note Denotes a PR that will be considered when it comes time to generate release notes. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

[v0.44.x] Conversion webhook is misbehaving on kubectl patch
5 participants