Skip to content
This repository has been archived by the owner on May 28, 2023. It is now read-only.

review README.md and CONTRIBUTING.md #31

Closed
PhilipMay opened this issue Jul 1, 2021 · 12 comments
Closed

review README.md and CONTRIBUTING.md #31

PhilipMay opened this issue Jul 1, 2021 · 12 comments
Assignees

Comments

@PhilipMay
Copy link
Member

PhilipMay commented Jul 1, 2021

Review README.md and CONTRIBUTING.md

  • is there something missing? maybe compare with optuna and transformers
  • spelling
  • idiomatic english
  • consistency
  • correctness
  • links ok?
  • ...

PS: The real documentation is still missing and a know issue.

@PhilipMay
Copy link
Member Author

Maybe @twolffpiggott can do that?

@PhilipMay
Copy link
Member Author

I think the headline "Code of conduct" should be "Code of Conduct" in CONTRIBUTING.md
Same for "Engaging in our project" -> "Engaging in our Project"

@twolffpiggott
Copy link
Collaborator

Sounds good 👍

@PhilipMay
Copy link
Member Author

Sounds good 👍

Hey @twolffpiggott - what does that mean?
Are you done with review and everything is ok or does it mean you will review later?
Sorry I am confused. :-)

@twolffpiggott
Copy link
Collaborator

No worries, I should be more explicit!

I mean that I will be doing the review as suggested. First priority for today is the transformers integration, then may be able to complete the review today as well; will update on this

@PhilipMay
Copy link
Member Author

@michalharakal as discussed today:
Maybe you could also hava a look on those 2 documents.
Perhaps check if something should be added to the Style Guidelines and so on.

@PhilipMay
Copy link
Member Author

Changes go to #40

@michalharakal
Copy link
Collaborator

@PhilipMay what about versioning scheme for the library itself? like https://semver.org/ ?

@PhilipMay
Copy link
Member Author

PhilipMay commented Jul 2, 2021

@PhilipMay what about versioning scheme for the library itself? like https://semver.org/ ?

Good point Michal! Could you add that to the PR #40 which is opened by Tim?
Just push to this branch: https://github.com/telekom/HPOflow/tree/review-initial-documentation
Maybe at the CONTRIBUTING.md at release checklist or styleguide - I am not sure.

@michalharakal
Copy link
Collaborator

@PhilipMay We could also have github action releasing to pypi bound to the setting of the version tag, so only if a new git tag is set, a an upload to pipy is started. I would this separate from PR #40 and create a new one for the release action.

@PhilipMay
Copy link
Member Author

PhilipMay commented Jul 3, 2021

@PhilipMay We could also have github action releasing to pypi bound to the setting of the version tag, so only if a new git tag is set, a an upload to pipy is started.

Yes. That would be possible. The reason why I wanted to have the version number in git is that it is possible to install the package with pip install git+<git_url>. If you do that the version number also should be right. But we could do both...

Maybe we should open a new issue and describe what the action should do and when and how the version number is handled and where. And when exactly the version is updated to which value.

@PhilipMay
Copy link
Member Author

Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants