You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Looking at the new implementation of Histograms there seems to be a direct relation between the labels/ticks on the X-axis and the bars. In my opinion this should not always be the case.
Take time series or datasets with very large numbers in the X-range. Here you want to find humanly readable/reference-able values like "Jan 2017" or "5M" instead of "Jan 3rd 2017" and "5.010.014".
This can mean that the tick will end up in the middle of a bar and not the edges and we must be able to control that.
This does not seem to be possible with the new implementation. Or am I wrong?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Looking at the new implementation of Histograms there seems to be a direct relation between the labels/ticks on the X-axis and the bars. In my opinion this should not always be the case.
Take time series or datasets with very large numbers in the X-range. Here you want to find humanly readable/reference-able values like "Jan 2017" or "5M" instead of "Jan 3rd 2017" and "5.010.014".
This can mean that the tick will end up in the middle of a bar and not the edges and we must be able to control that.
This does not seem to be possible with the new implementation. Or am I wrong?
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: