Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

resource/storage_table: Lookup correct Storage Table URL #4234

Merged

Conversation

stack72
Copy link
Contributor

@stack72 stack72 commented Sep 4, 2019

Before this change, we were getting an error message that looked as
follows:

Error checking for existence of existing Storage Table "valuesd604911c" (Account "storage72db33a8" / Resource Group "resourcegroup44d095f7"): tables.Client#Exists: Failure sending request: StatusCode=0 -- Original Error: Get https://resourcegroup44d095f7.table.core.windows.net/Tables('valuesd604911c'): dial tcp: lookup resourcegroup44d095f7.table.core.windows.net on 192.168.1.254:53: no such host

Notice the lookup URL - it's using the resource group not accountName

Before this change, we were getting an error message that looked as
follows:

```
Error checking for existence of existing Storage Table "valuesd604911c" (Account "storage72db33a8" / Resource Group "resourcegroup44d095f7"): tables.Client#Exists: Failure sending request: StatusCode=0 -- Original Error: Get https://resourcegroup44d095f7.table.core.windows.net/Tables('valuesd604911c'): dial tcp: lookup resourcegroup44d095f7.table.core.windows.net on 192.168.1.254:53: no such host
```

Notice the lookup URL - it's using the resource group not accountName
Copy link
Contributor

@tombuildsstuff tombuildsstuff left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM - thanks for this @stack72

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Sep 18, 2019

This has been released in version 1.34.0 of the provider. Please see the Terraform documentation on provider versioning or reach out if you need any assistance upgrading. As an example:

provider "azurerm" {
    version = "~> 1.34.0"
}
# ... other configuration ...

@ghost
Copy link

ghost commented Mar 29, 2020

I'm going to lock this issue because it has been closed for 30 days ⏳. This helps our maintainers find and focus on the active issues.

If you feel this issue should be reopened, we encourage creating a new issue linking back to this one for added context. If you feel I made an error 🤖 🙉 , please reach out to my human friends 👉 hashibot-feedback@hashicorp.com. Thanks!

@ghost ghost locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 29, 2020
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants