Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

options #29

Closed
boneskull opened this issue Apr 17, 2016 · 1 comment
Closed

options #29

boneskull opened this issue Apr 17, 2016 · 1 comment

Comments

@boneskull
Copy link
Contributor

I like the idea of this project, and I had even began writing something similar.

A common thread through several issues is "options". One needs to be able to have greater control over scripty's behavior. See #28 for an example.

If using the config prop of package.json is problematic, perhaps a .scriptyrc is warranted?

Anyway, I think there hasn't been a decision made on this strategy, so here's an issue for discussion.

@searls
Copy link
Member

searls commented Apr 18, 2016

We did introduce a "scripty" package.json entry this weekend for "path" and "windowsPath" keys in 1.4.0.

If this tool didn't depend on npm, a standalone file might make sense, but since it depends on the package.json that seems like the best place to store sticky config options

@searls searls closed this as completed Apr 18, 2016
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants