Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Please specify more clearly the license #14

Closed
krytarowski opened this issue Jan 12, 2016 · 5 comments
Closed

Please specify more clearly the license #14

krytarowski opened this issue Jan 12, 2016 · 5 comments

Comments

@krytarowski
Copy link
Contributor

MPL-1.1 or what version of LGPL? Any?

Thank you

@theZiz
Copy link
Owner

theZiz commented Jan 12, 2016

Tbh I don't care. LGPL2+ and MPL1.1 sounds good. I don't need compatibility with GPL (obviously), so MPL 1.1 sounds good, too. However if you need MPL2.0 for some reason, I am fine with this, too. I will update the informations in the README the next days. I didn't tinker with licenses for a long time. These days I choose just GPL2+ for most new projects.

@krytarowski
Copy link
Contributor Author

I'm ok with LGPL+, so any LGPL (2.0, 2.1, 3.0 or later). This wasn't explicitly set. Please add a note about it.

This is what I used in the pkgsrc package http://pkgsrc.se/textproc/aha

@xtaran
Copy link
Contributor

xtaran commented Jan 12, 2016

For Debian I assumed "MPL 1.1 or LGPL-3+". But I'm fine with any of the mentioned licenses if it makes the licensing clearer. :-)

@theZiz
Copy link
Owner

theZiz commented Jan 13, 2016

LGPL2+ does include LGPL3+, so you don't need to change anything @xtaran, do you?

@xtaran
Copy link
Contributor

xtaran commented Jan 13, 2016

I do have to change that if you go with LGPL2+, but that's no reason to not choose LGPL2+.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants