Notable ascents not sorted by CPR (nor grade)

[Arzorth]

The first notable ascent in my profile is a gym top rope clean 7a (CPR decay: 2754 (-47 point)) while my highest grade is given by a rock lead pink point 7b (CPR decay: 2901 (-47 point)) and my highest CPR is given by a rock lead on sight 7a+ (CPR decay: 3205 (-39 point)).

[DaneEvans]

Yeah, volume is a terrible metric for sorting these tables. It's enough to stop me from logging top ropes as clean. And makes it certain that I'll never log gym laps

…

On Fri, 23 Dec 2022, 4:45 am Arzorth, ***@***.***> wrote: [image: image] <https://user-images.githubusercontent.com/17315806/207277173-9eeba596-361f-4429-869b-05a2e545a75c.png> The first notable ascent in my profile is a gym top rope clean 7a (CPR decay: 2754 (-47 point)) while my highest grade is given by a rock lead pink point 7b (CPR decay: 2901 (-47 point)) and my highest CPR is given by a rock lead on sight 7a+ (CPR decay: 3205 (-39 point)). — Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub <#4159>, or unsubscribe <https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AFIRN4K2TZD2NK3XAMFWZIDWOSHR5ANCNFSM6AAAAAATG66M6Q> . You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread.Message ID: ***@***.***>

[rouletout]

Not surre I understand what the issue is - is it the sorting? That Gym Top Rope is above Sport?

[Arzorth]

Hi!

Well, yes, the issue is that ascent types in notable ascents should not be sorted by number of ascents, but for max CPR.

In this example, max CPR of Sport is 3205 (given by a 7a+ on sight) and the max CPR of Gym Top rope is 2754 (given by a 7a clean).

By area, using number of ascents is more reasonable though, as it shows "most frequented area":

In case of tick types, "most frequented tick type" is not a metric users are interested in, but rather "maximum difficulty achieved per tick type"

Regards

[Arzorth]

(updated explanation)

[Arzorth]

bumping some issues I consider important