Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Feature Request: Support PF2e area rules more accurately #52

Closed
esheyw opened this issue Mar 4, 2023 · 2 comments
Closed

Feature Request: Support PF2e area rules more accurately #52

esheyw opened this issue Mar 4, 2023 · 2 comments

Comments

@esheyw
Copy link

esheyw commented Mar 4, 2023

Currently, if I have a 15ft diagonal cone, based on pf2e area rules, it should only target the grid spaces highlighted in this screenshot:

however, if I use this modules alt-click-to-target-under-template feature, it is too greedy, and grabs anything over 50% covered by the base template area:

for orthogonal cones, it's fine up until 25ft:

for a 5 foot emanation, which should be every space around a character, it only targets orthogonally (and includes the caster when it shouldn't:

Bursts seem to work up until 15 feet and then the base template vs affected squares start disagreeing again:

Bursts and Emanations are both circle templates, but the system has them behave differently depending on if they're on a grid intersection or the centre of a space.

@theripper93
Copy link
Owner

Hello! It seems you haven't read the Before Posting an issue as indicated at the top of the Repository Readme The Issue has been closed.

If you are reporting a bug, feel free to follow the steps here (https://theripper93.com/info/issues) and reopen the issue with all the relevant information.

@theripper93
Copy link
Owner

I will add, that template targeting is not a main feature/focus of smart target, if pf2e has special rules, the system should implement the targeting itself

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants