Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade pydantic to 0.30 #384

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Jul 12, 2019
Merged

Upgrade pydantic to 0.30 #384

merged 2 commits into from
Jul 12, 2019

Conversation

jekirl
Copy link
Contributor

@jekirl jekirl commented Jul 12, 2019

This bumps the pydantic version to 0.30. It may be worth waiting on merging this until pydantic 0.31

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jul 12, 2019

Codecov Report

Merging #384 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is 100%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##           master   #384   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage     100%   100%           
=====================================
  Files         237    237           
  Lines        5552   5552           
=====================================
  Hits         5552   5552
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
fastapi/openapi/utils.py 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️
fastapi/utils.py 100% <100%> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 195559c...b012013. Read the comment docs.

@tiangolo tiangolo merged commit 46a986c into fastapi:master Jul 12, 2019
@tiangolo
Copy link
Member

Great job! 🎉

I just updated it to pin Pydantic to 0.30, as 0.31 is not released yet and could include breaking changes.

It's perfect to have these changes for each release, I prefer to have frequent independent releases with each dependency version when possible. In case a future version breaks something, users can still use the features and bug fixes in this version.

Thanks! 🎉 🚀 🍰

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants