Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

random forest and decision tree updates to party engine #50

Merged
merged 13 commits into from
May 27, 2021
Merged

Conversation

topepo
Copy link
Member

@topepo topepo commented Apr 23, 2021

These allow for tuning parameters to be more easily specified and we don't need the pec package.

The prediction code is very slow; we'll look into this later. I suspect that it is related to how party returns the results. For example, for survival predictions, they produce KM objects (survfit) which then need to be used to make a probability prediction.

A little will need to happen in tune with tunable() and there is a PR in dials for the parameter objects.

R/0_imports.R Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
R/party.R Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
R/party.R Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
R/party.R Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@EmilHvitfeldt
Copy link
Member

I suspect some of the slowness to come from interpolate_km_values() similarly to #47

@topepo topepo merged commit d78c891 into master May 27, 2021
@topepo topepo deleted the parties branch May 27, 2021 21:30
@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Nov 5, 2021

This pull request has been automatically locked. If you believe you have found a related problem, please file a new issue (with a reprex: https://reprex.tidyverse.org) and link to this issue.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Nov 5, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants