Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Consider augment() support for a parsnip model, but require newdata as an argument #401

Closed
DavisVaughan opened this issue Dec 14, 2020 · 2 comments
Closed

Consider augment() support for a parsnip model, but require newdata as an argument #401

DavisVaughan opened this issue Dec 14, 2020 · 2 comments
Labels
feature a feature request or enhancement

Comments

@DavisVaughan
Copy link
Member

This gives us augment support, with the safety of not predicting on the training set
@juliasilge juliasilge added the feature a feature request or enhancement label Dec 14, 2020
topepo added a commit that referenced this issue Jan 17, 2021
@topepo
augment method for #401
1f0de51
@juliasilge
Copy link
Member

Closed in #415

@github-actions
Copy link

github-actions bot commented Mar 6, 2021

This issue has been automatically locked. If you believe you have found a related problem, please file a new issue (with a reprex: https://reprex.tidyverse.org) and link to this issue.

@github-actions github-actions bot locked and limited conversation to collaborators Mar 6, 2021
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
feature a feature request or enhancement
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
2 participants
@juliasilge @DavisVaughan