You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
^ This line shows how the default width for geom_bar and geom_col is selected as "By default, set to 90% of the resolution of the data." I recently came across a situation where I was making a facetted column chart and the resolution of the data (across all groups) was very small. So small, that I could not see the columns. Manually setting the width solved the issue until I realized what was happening. The resolution within groups was much larger. I'm suggesting it may be better to compute the resolution for each group, then perhaps take the minimum resolution.
This should illustrate the issue:
> library(tidyverse)
-- Attaching packages ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ tidyverse 1.3.0 --
v ggplot2 3.3.3 v purrr 0.3.4
v tibble 3.0.6 v dplyr 1.0.3
v tidyr 1.1.2 v stringr 1.4.0
v readr 1.4.0 v forcats 0.5.1
-- Conflicts --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- tidyverse_conflicts() --
x dplyr::filter() masks stats::filter()
x dplyr::lag() masks stats::lag()
I start by creating a tibble where the resolution without considering group is 0.1.
my_tibble <- tibble(x = c(1.5, 2.5, 3.5,
1.6, 2.6, 3.6),
y = c(10, 9, 8,
20, 19, 18),
group = rep(c("a", "b"), each = 3))
> resolution(x = my_tibble$x, zero = FALSE)
[1] 0.1
Then making my facetted plot creates strangely narrow columns. I believe this should illustrate the problem. If the values within each group have a reasonable resolution for plotting, but the resolution of all data is very narrow plots look funny (or in my real-data case, do not show up at all).
ggplot(data = my_tibble, mapping = aes(x = x, y = y, fill = group)) +
geom_col() +
facet_grid(cols = vars(group))
Here is one possible way to determine a more appropriate width:
ggplot2/R/geom-bar.r
Line 132 in dbd7d79
^ This line shows how the default width for
geom_bar
andgeom_col
is selected as "By default, set to 90% of the resolution of the data." I recently came across a situation where I was making a facetted column chart and the resolution of the data (across all groups) was very small. So small, that I could not see the columns. Manually setting thewidth
solved the issue until I realized what was happening. The resolution within groups was much larger. I'm suggesting it may be better to compute the resolution for each group, then perhaps take the minimum resolution.This should illustrate the issue:
I start by creating a
tibble
where the resolution without consideringgroup
is 0.1.Then making my facetted plot creates strangely narrow columns. I believe this should illustrate the problem. If the values within each group have a reasonable resolution for plotting, but the resolution of all data is very narrow plots look funny (or in my real-data case, do not show up at all).
Here is one possible way to determine a more appropriate width:
Overriding the default
width
provides a more natural ggplot.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: