New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Re-licensing readr as MIT (1/2) #1189
Comments
I agree 👍 |
I agree |
I do agree 👍 |
I agree |
I agree!
…On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 4:44 PM Alexey Stukalov ***@***.***> wrote:
I do agree 👍
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1189 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAB4EB2JVAEHD3FTFXZPKATTHYIQZANCNFSM42TURDLA>
.
|
I agree 👍 |
I agree |
Before deciding whether to agree, may I ask what shortcomings of GPL2 are you trying to avoid? Also, what if some of the contributors disagree? |
I agree |
I agree.
|
1 similar comment
I agree. |
I agree |
I agree. |
1 similar comment
I agree. |
I agree |
I agree. |
I agree. |
I agree.
…On Thu, Apr 8, 2021 at 2:44 PM dmurdoch ***@***.***> wrote:
I agree.
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
<#1189 (comment)>,
or unsubscribe
<https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AA2QEAIABWVV3J4Q4Z3ID4LTHYPSBANCNFSM42TURDLA>
.
--
Best wishes,
Michael
Cell: (917) 808 6508
|
i agree |
I agree. |
I agree |
I agree. |
I agree |
I agree. |
I agree |
2 similar comments
I agree |
I agree |
@lambdamoses Although we don't believe there's any reason to be concerned, some companies are made nervous by the terms of the GPL. Since we want our packages to be as used as widely as possible, we are moving towards the simpler and more permissive MIT license, which doesn't cause the same concerns. So far, we've been lucky and across the hundreds of contributors to the tidyverse, everyone has agreed to re-license their contributions. If someone didn't aggree, we would remove their code and, if necessary, implement the idea anew. This is permissible because copyright only protects the expression of the idea, not the idea itself. |
I agree. |
I agree |
1 similar comment
I agree |
@hadley Thank you for answering. I agree |
I agree |
2 similar comments
I agree |
I agree |
I agree
…On Sun, Apr 11, 2021 at 06:02, Mikhail Popov ***@***.***> wrote:
I agree
—
You are receiving this because you were mentioned.
Reply to this email directly, [view it on GitHub](#1189 (comment)), or [unsubscribe](https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAS7HXSK2MSDCVYIADXPV5DTIGMWHANCNFSM42TURDLA).
|
I agree |
1 similar comment
I agree |
Hi @antoine-lizee, @DanielleQuinn, @DanRuderman, @jrnold, @leeper, @mawds, @namelessjon, @npjc, @olgamie, @pralitp, @rgknight, |
I agree. Sorry for the delay |
I agree |
1 similar comment
I agree |
I agree ! Thanks for fetching me :-) |
I agree |
I agree, thanks for the prompt |
I agree |
1 similar comment
I agree |
I agree! |
We have made a good-faith attempt to get consent from all contributor to the package under the previous license. This has included reviewing contributions to the package for non-trivial changes, seeking agreement to re-license with GitHub issues, sending a reminding after two weeks, and reaching out by e-mail (where possible). Unfortunately, we have not received a response from @mawds and @olgamie. We have carefully reviewed their contributions. Given that the contributions are relatively small, and no one has objected to re-licensing across all tidyverse and r-lib repos, we are going to move ahead with the re-licensing. Of course, if we later discover that contributors are not happy with the re-licensing, we'll re-implement their changes. |
Sorry to reply so late, I agree. |
Sorry so late too, I agree |
We are systematically re-licensing tidyverse and r-lib packages to use the MIT license, to make our package licenses as clear and permissive as possible. To do so, we need the approval of all copyright holders, which I have found by reviewing contributions from all all non-RStudio contributors. @alyst, @antoine-lizee, @asnr, @bearloga, @billdenney, @blakeboswell, @boshek, @brianrice2, @briatte, @cb4ds, @cboettig, @DanielleQuinn, @DanRuderman, @dapperjapper, @dewittpe, @dmurdoch, @edwindj, @ellessenne, @GegznaV, @gergness, @ghaarsma, @hidekoji, @hoehleatsu, @Ironholds, @izahn, @jdblischak, @jdeboer, @jesse-ross, @johnmcdonnell, @jrnold, @keesdeschepper, @kmillar, @lambdamoses, @leeper, @mawds, @md0u80c9, @michaelquinn32, @mikmart, @nacnudus, @namelessjon, @noamross, @npjc, @olgamie, @pralitp, @QuLogic, @rgknight, @RomeroBarata, @salim-b, would you permit us to re-license readr with the MIT license? If so, please comment "I agree" below.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: