Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Re-licensing readr as MIT (1/2) #1189

Closed
48 tasks done
hadley opened this issue Apr 8, 2021 · 52 comments · Fixed by #1217
Closed
48 tasks done

Re-licensing readr as MIT (1/2) #1189

hadley opened this issue Apr 8, 2021 · 52 comments · Fixed by #1217

Comments

@hadley
Copy link
Member

hadley commented Apr 8, 2021

We are systematically re-licensing tidyverse and r-lib packages to use the MIT license, to make our package licenses as clear and permissive as possible. To do so, we need the approval of all copyright holders, which I have found by reviewing contributions from all all non-RStudio contributors. @alyst, @antoine-lizee, @asnr, @bearloga, @billdenney, @blakeboswell, @boshek, @brianrice2, @briatte, @cb4ds, @cboettig, @DanielleQuinn, @DanRuderman, @dapperjapper, @dewittpe, @dmurdoch, @edwindj, @ellessenne, @GegznaV, @gergness, @ghaarsma, @hidekoji, @hoehleatsu, @Ironholds, @izahn, @jdblischak, @jdeboer, @jesse-ross, @johnmcdonnell, @jrnold, @keesdeschepper, @kmillar, @lambdamoses, @leeper, @mawds, @md0u80c9, @michaelquinn32, @mikmart, @nacnudus, @namelessjon, @noamross, @npjc, @olgamie, @pralitp, @QuLogic, @rgknight, @RomeroBarata, @salim-b, would you permit us to re-license readr with the MIT license? If so, please comment "I agree" below.

@brianrice2
Copy link
Contributor

I agree 👍

@billdenney
Copy link
Contributor

I agree

@alyst
Copy link
Contributor

alyst commented Apr 8, 2021

I do agree 👍

@keesdeschepper
Copy link
Contributor

I agree

@dapperjapper
Copy link
Contributor

dapperjapper commented Apr 8, 2021 via email

@cboettig
Copy link
Contributor

cboettig commented Apr 8, 2021

I agree 👍

@izahn
Copy link
Contributor

izahn commented Apr 8, 2021

I agree

@lambdamoses
Copy link
Contributor

Before deciding whether to agree, may I ask what shortcomings of GPL2 are you trying to avoid? Also, what if some of the contributors disagree?

@mhoehle
Copy link
Contributor

mhoehle commented Apr 8, 2021

I agree

@dewittpe
Copy link
Contributor

dewittpe commented Apr 8, 2021 via email

1 similar comment
@QuLogic
Copy link
Contributor

QuLogic commented Apr 8, 2021

I agree.

@cb4ds
Copy link
Contributor

cb4ds commented Apr 8, 2021

I agree

@hidekoji
Copy link
Contributor

hidekoji commented Apr 8, 2021

I agree.

1 similar comment
@md0u80c9
Copy link
Contributor

md0u80c9 commented Apr 8, 2021

I agree.

@gergness
Copy link
Contributor

gergness commented Apr 8, 2021

I agree

@jesse-ross
Copy link
Contributor

I agree.

@jdeboer
Copy link
Contributor

jdeboer commented Apr 8, 2021 via email

@dmurdoch
Copy link
Contributor

dmurdoch commented Apr 8, 2021

I agree.

@michaelquinn32
Copy link
Contributor

michaelquinn32 commented Apr 8, 2021 via email

@boshek
Copy link
Contributor

boshek commented Apr 8, 2021

i agree

@blakeboswell
Copy link
Contributor

I agree.

@johnmcdonnell
Copy link
Contributor

I agree

@RomeroBarata
Copy link
Contributor

I agree.

@kmillar
Copy link
Contributor

kmillar commented Apr 9, 2021

I agree

@ellessenne
Copy link
Contributor

I agree.

@nacnudus
Copy link
Contributor

nacnudus commented Apr 9, 2021

I agree

2 similar comments
@edwindj
Copy link
Contributor

edwindj commented Apr 9, 2021

I agree

@salim-b
Copy link
Contributor

salim-b commented Apr 9, 2021

I agree

@hadley
Copy link
Member Author

hadley commented Apr 9, 2021

@lambdamoses Although we don't believe there's any reason to be concerned, some companies are made nervous by the terms of the GPL. Since we want our packages to be as used as widely as possible, we are moving towards the simpler and more permissive MIT license, which doesn't cause the same concerns.

So far, we've been lucky and across the hundreds of contributors to the tidyverse, everyone has agreed to re-license their contributions. If someone didn't aggree, we would remove their code and, if necessary, implement the idea anew. This is permissible because copyright only protects the expression of the idea, not the idea itself.

@asnr
Copy link
Contributor

asnr commented Apr 9, 2021

I agree.

@noamross
Copy link
Contributor

noamross commented Apr 9, 2021

I agree

1 similar comment
@jdblischak
Copy link
Contributor

I agree

@lambdamoses
Copy link
Contributor

@hadley Thank you for answering. I agree

@GegznaV
Copy link
Contributor

GegznaV commented Apr 9, 2021

I agree

2 similar comments
@ghaarsma
Copy link
Contributor

I agree

@bearloga
Copy link
Contributor

I agree

@Ironholds
Copy link
Contributor

Ironholds commented Apr 11, 2021 via email

@mikmart
Copy link
Contributor

mikmart commented Apr 11, 2021

I agree

1 similar comment
@briatte
Copy link
Contributor

briatte commented Apr 16, 2021

I agree

@batpigandme
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @antoine-lizee, @DanielleQuinn, @DanRuderman, @jrnold, @leeper, @mawds, @namelessjon, @npjc, @olgamie, @pralitp, @rgknight,
We'd love to get your agreement please, if you could take a look when you have a chance. 🙂
Thanks!

@namelessjon
Copy link
Contributor

I agree. Sorry for the delay

@rgknight
Copy link
Contributor

I agree

1 similar comment
@pralitp
Copy link
Contributor

pralitp commented May 19, 2021

I agree

@antoine-lizee
Copy link
Contributor

I agree ! Thanks for fetching me :-)

@DanRuderman
Copy link

I agree

@npjc
Copy link
Contributor

npjc commented May 19, 2021

I agree, thanks for the prompt

@leeper
Copy link
Contributor

leeper commented May 22, 2021

I agree

1 similar comment
@jrnold
Copy link
Contributor

jrnold commented May 28, 2021

I agree

@DanielleQuinn
Copy link
Contributor

I agree!

@hadley
Copy link
Member Author

hadley commented Jun 3, 2021

We have made a good-faith attempt to get consent from all contributor to the package under the previous license. This has included reviewing contributions to the package for non-trivial changes, seeking agreement to re-license with GitHub issues, sending a reminding after two weeks, and reaching out by e-mail (where possible).

Unfortunately, we have not received a response from @mawds and @olgamie. We have carefully reviewed their contributions. Given that the contributions are relatively small, and no one has objected to re-licensing across all tidyverse and r-lib repos, we are going to move ahead with the re-licensing. Of course, if we later discover that contributors are not happy with the re-licensing, we'll re-implement their changes.

batpigandme added a commit that referenced this issue Jun 3, 2021
jimhester pushed a commit that referenced this issue Jun 3, 2021
@olgamie
Copy link
Contributor

olgamie commented Jun 6, 2021

Sorry to reply so late, I agree.

@mawds
Copy link
Contributor

mawds commented Jun 29, 2021

Sorry so late too, I agree

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.