Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Should N4868 be used instead of N4861 here? #4

Closed
frederick-vs-ja opened this issue Jun 1, 2021 · 2 comments
Closed

Should N4868 be used instead of N4861 here? #4

frederick-vs-ja opened this issue Jun 1, 2021 · 2 comments

Comments

@frederick-vs-ja
Copy link

N4868 only contains editorial fixes since the C++20 standard (see N4867). IMO N4868, like N3337/N4140, is more preferable than N4861.

@timsong-cpp
Copy link
Owner

I suppose I can pluck out N4868 from the git history - it looks like I did make a build then.

@timsong-cpp
Copy link
Owner

Done. It has two extra commits that got force-pushed away in the actual N4868, but those appear to be pure LaTeX cleanups that should have no effect on the rendered output.

In the future this sort of requests should be made close to the draft's publication. It's a lot more work to generate HTML for a historical draft.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants