Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

gap: Set and SetRandom methods should have a pointer receiver #158

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Apr 29, 2023

Conversation

aykevl
Copy link
Member

@aykevl aykevl commented Apr 27, 2023

Without it, these calls are a no-op.

Fixes: #144

In particular, this fixes a problem where IsRandom() would always return false on Linux. With this fix, it correctly returns whether the address is a random address.

Without it, these calls are a no-op.

Fixes: #144

In particular, this fixes a problem where IsRandom() would always return
false on Linux. With this fix, it correctly returns whether the address
is a random address.
@deadprogram
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the fix @aykevl now merging.

@deadprogram deadprogram merged commit 71f1759 into dev Apr 29, 2023
@deadprogram deadprogram deleted the fix-SetRandom branch April 29, 2023 20:13
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants