-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 57
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add support for rsync and/or scp #116
Comments
Hi, Thanks for your suggestion. I will look into how to make this possible. Probably starting with scp. |
@chrispcampbell so this is more tricky than I though as it requires to support listing as well which does not come out of the box with scp. So there is really 2 alternatives here:
|
@blender Thanks for looking into this. Yeah, I'm not sure there's a way to list via
|
It's probably easier with I've done more exploration around scp so it'll try with that somehow. My plan so far is to make remote caches mutually exclusive for now. This means you can't have a remote cache on S3 and an scp cache. In the mean time, if you can mount the scp directory via FUSE, rome can use it as |
@chrispcampbell Thanks to @BalestraPatrick you can now use whatever backend you want |
You can try the pre-release at: https://github.com/blender/Rome/releases/tag/v0.22.0.59 |
Enhancement Suggestion
Add support for using
rsync
and/orscp
(or similar) to move files between the local Rome cache and a remote (privately hosted) file store.For example:
Current and suggested behavior
Currently only Amazon's S3 is supported as remote storage. Supporting
rsync
and/orscp
would allow for using existing in-house storage infrastructure.Why would the enhancement be useful to most users
Supporting alternative remote copy mechanisms would allow users to get all the benefits of Rome's remote caching support without relying on a cloud storage provider.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: