-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
don't interact with XSB via a pipe #28
Comments
Which program was running at the time? Also, do we still have the logfile? (Separate observation: logs are likely to get enormous for long runs of the (Snipped quote to avoid issue link.) |
Something similar just happened when stress-testing. The packet was nothing <<< incoming: arp_packet:
I was running a 1-switch, 8-host mininet with all hosts arpinging someone TODO: repeat the stress-test with some debugging features re: XSB errors. |
awesome! glad you could reproduce this as well. fortunately or unfortunately, XSB doesn't seem to use a lot of memory from what I can tell on the testbed. |
I believe that this was fixed in commit 9829e67. We should keep an eye on XSB in the meantime, though. |
we need to replace the current method of interacting with XSB via a Unix pipe.
under the current regime, FlowLog will hang delightfully without warning due to unknown difficulties with XSB. here is the backtrace of the two stuck processes (they were stuck for several minutes at this point, which caused the switches to give-up on the controller, since it was not following the OpenFlow keep-alive protocol):
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: