Possible solution to supporting 64-bit processes via the ManagedBlink1 library for Windows.

[jrotello]

This is a possible solution to 64-bit processes crashing when using the ManagedBlink1 library. It should be tested on a 32-bit system prior to merging.

This does not resolve the same issue with the non-managed Blink1 library.

I tested by running the ConsoleDemo in the ManagedBlink1 solution.

*This is a duplicate of issue #56 (now closed). See that issue for repro instructions. *

[jrotello]

I couldn't fully test this with my VM because it wouldn't find the Blink(1). The demo application did make it past the enumeration call where my change was though, so I think it is safe.

[todbot]

Verified that it works just fine on a Windows 7 Ultimate 32-bit VM. Thanks Jason!
(btw, it defaulted to .NET 4.5 in the solution properties. Seems okay for .NET 4.0)

[jrotello]

I left it as .net 4.5 to match the other Windows demo projects. It should compile as .NET 4 though. I can update those projects if you think it would be beneficial.

[coriscow]

Hello,

I'm a java developer that have recently purchased a couple of blinks for evaluation purpuses in order to include its functionality in a bigger, company-wide project. How ever, it is mandatory for us to have a 64bit dll. Is it possible? is finally solved? And if not, could you make a 64bit compilation?

Thanks in advance