Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

pep257 configuration #51

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Nov 23, 2015
Merged

pep257 configuration #51

merged 1 commit into from
Nov 23, 2015

Conversation

tomato42
Copy link
Member

both when running standalone and when running as part
of prospector tool

We ignore D203 because it conflicts with the newer D211,
the former requires 1 whiteline before class doc text while
the latter requires no whitelines before class doc text

@tomato42
configuration for pep257 tool
f2b320a 
both when running standalone and when running as part
of prospector tool

We ignore D203 because it conflicts with the newer D211,
the former requires 1 whiteline before class doc text while
the latter requires no whitelines before class doc text
@landscape-bot
Copy link

Code Health
Repository health increased by 0.28% when pulling f2b320a on pep257 into 7e6ad8c on master.

@tomato42 tomato42 added the review request PR finished, ready for review label Nov 20, 2015
@The-Mule
Copy link
Collaborator

r+

@tomato42 tomato42 merged commit f2b320a into master Nov 23, 2015
@tomato42 tomato42 deleted the pep257 branch November 23, 2015 14:07
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers
No reviews
Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
review request PR finished, ready for review
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.
3 participants
@tomato42 @landscape-bot @The-Mule