Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

QuickfixsignsListBufferSigns: use sign_getplaced #84

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

blueyed
Copy link
Contributor

@blueyed blueyed commented Jun 3, 2019

TODO: does not set/have the "sign" attribute (easily), only used with
AssertUniqueSigns, where it could be removed/replaced - maybe only for
the new method / if missing then?!

Fixes #83.

TODO: does not set/have the "sign" attribute (easily), only used with
AssertUniqueSigns, where it could be removed/replaced - maybe only for
the new method / if missing then?!

Fixes tomtom#83.
@blueyed
Copy link
Contributor Author

blueyed commented Jul 13, 2019

@tomtom any feedback?

@tomtom
Copy link
Owner

tomtom commented Jul 14, 2019

I currently have no recent version of vim available that already has the sign_*() functions, which is why I cannot test it etc.

I also wonder if qfs is still necessary with the new sign api since it originated in an effort to work around the limitations of the old api.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

s:ProcessSign does not handle new sign output
2 participants