You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Rubygems 2.2 can share a local gem repository among ruby versions, i.e. instead of something like ruby/2.1.0/gems, one would just have gems, with compiled extensions kept separately and organized by ABI version.
As a more concrete example, on an older project that was created prior to rubygems 2.2, I have:
Having looked into it further, I think the rubygems 2.2 thing is a red herring. I now think this is a bug in bundler, so I've filed an issue there: rubygems/bundler#2987
Rubygems 2.2 can share a local gem repository among ruby versions, i.e. instead of something like
ruby/2.1.0/gems
, one would just havegems
, with compiled extensions kept separately and organized by ABI version.As a more concrete example, on an older project that was created prior to rubygems 2.2, I have:
on a brand new project with rubygems 2.2 installed, I have:
This doesn't play nicely with vim-bundler's assumptions about the gem repository layout, and as such 'path' isn't set up correctly, etc.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: